| studied, but such study is almost valueless without
personal experiment at the keyboard, in order that the teacher may not only
know theoretically how a given action should be performed, but can do it
himself, and know how he does it.
The would-be teacher must realize that mere text-book knowledge is not
enough ; the essential is to be able to apply it practically. It is here
that so many candidates show weakness in the oral part of teachers'
examinations. In numberless cases an examiner finds that the candidate has
half digested a mass of more or less misunderstood facts concerning the
teaching of the piano, violin, &c., but has not the vaguest idea of
practical teaching. For example, the examiner asks a piano candidate how to
obtain singing tone, and receives the usual reply " By arm weight." He then
asks to be shown exactly how the candidate would teach this to a young
pupil, and the reply will either be a memorized passage from a book on piano
technique, totally incomprehensible to the average pupil, or some confused
stammering which shows immediately that the candidate really knows nothing
about the matter. Very occasionally a candidate can be induced to
demonstrate the point at the keyboard, and in most cases such a
demonstration will be quite at variance with what he has attempted to
explain. Often enough, too, the method of performance exhibited in the
pieces, &c., will be entirely different from that which the candidate
apparently intends to adopt in teaching. Consistency, and a definite method
are needed ; haphazard ideas are worse than useless. As the late Dr. C. W.
Pearce remarked in his " Art of the Piano Teacher " " Any method is better
than none at all."
There are two absolute essentials in connection with the imparting of
knowledge
(a) The ability to bring oneself down to the pupil's mental level-to
see things through his eyes ;
(b) The ability to make explanations in perfectly simple, clear, and
intelligible language.
The former of these desiderata has already been mentioned. The
teacher with his wider knowledge may easily be able to grasp some fact to
the significance of which the pupil, with his limited learning, may be
blind. It is always well to work on the assumption that the pupil knows
nothing except what the teacher himself has taught him. With regard to (b)
it must be remarked that explanations have to be adapted to individual
pupils ; what will make things perfectly clear to one may remain
unintelligible to another. But in any case, explanations must be as simple
as possible, and in this direction the average text-book is often of little
help. To take a simple example. In explaining the difference between Simple
and Compound Times, some books state that the change from an undotted beat
to a dotted one involves " a
To be continued |